<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com">
<title>Thorax recent issues</title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com</link>
<description>Thorax RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Thorax</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0040-6376</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/e2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/518?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/524?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/533?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/548?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/571?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/611?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif">
<title>Thorax</title>
<url>http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/e2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pleural procedures]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/e2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Asciak R, Bedawi EO, Bhatnagar R<I>, et al.</I> British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pleural procedures. <I>Thorax</I> 2023;78:s43-s68.</p>
<p>It has been noted that there is a missing word towards the end of page nine under &lsquo;Drain size&rsquo;. The correct sentence should be: <I>The only RCT with adequate sample size found small-bore drains not to be non-inferior to large-bore drains in terms of pleurodesis efficacy</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2022-219371corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2022-219371corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pleural procedures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Questioned role of adjunctive corticosteroids in non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: to give or not to give]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy is a cornerstone of treatment for <I>Pneumocystis jirovecii</I> pneumonia (PcP) in patients with HIV and moderate to severe hypoxaemia, as recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, HIV Medicine Association and National Institutes of Health.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> In contrast, the use of corticosteroids in HIV-negative immunocompromised patients with PcP remains controversial, with conflicting results across observational studies, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> This uncertainty provided the rationale for Reizine and colleagues to evaluate the prognostic impact and safety of early adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in HIV-negative patients with proven or probable PcP in the large, multicentre French PRONOCYSTIS cohort (2011&ndash;2021), recently published in <I>Thorax</I>.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p> <p>To address the substantial baseline heterogeneity inherent to this population, the investigators employed a non-parsimonious propensity score matching strategy. Early adjunctive corticosteroid therapy was defined as initiation of &gt;1 mg/kg/day of equivalent prednisone within 5 days of anti-PcP treatment, with...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Poveda, L., Chastain, D. B., Maloney, J., Henao-Martinez, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224646</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224646</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Respiratory infection]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Questioned role of adjunctive corticosteroids in non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: to give or not to give]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory infection</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>510</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variability: the law of life?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Early in the 20th century, Osler published his famous Law of life: &lsquo;...no two individuals react alike under the abnormal conditions which we know as disease<I>&rsquo;</I>. Cystic fibrosis (CF) obeys this law, people sharing identical <I>CFTR</I> gene variants often differing in phenotype.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> CFTR modulators were the first drugs to restore CFTR protein function through stabilisation (correctors) and channel activity (potentiators). Combinations, both dual and more so triple, have demonstrated multi-organ benefits.<sup><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></sup> However, around mean improvements in pulmonary outcomes and sweat chloride (diagnostic hallmark/CFTR functional biomarker), interindividual variability is a poorly understood characteristic of most studies.</p> <p>Several mechanisms underlying this variability have been proposed, related both to individual biology and to environment or behaviour (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). Regarding biology: (1) <I>CFTR variant</I> is most clearly related; modulators require CFTR protein, so most people possessing two class 1 variants do not express CFTR and will not...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, J. C., Wilson, G., Hughes, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2026-224809</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2026-224809</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variability: the law of life?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cystic fibrosis</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>513</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LAMA and ICS discontinuation in COPD: run-in to an exacerbation?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have long been foundational in COPD management. LAMAs, through their bronchodilatory effects, are well known to improve health-related quality of life and reduce exacerbation rates,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> potentially by reducing hyperinflation.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> ICS therapy has been widely recognised for its role in controlling airway inflammation and preventing exacerbations in patients with COPD, particularly in those with elevated blood eosinophil counts.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3 4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref> ICS, however, are frequently prescribed to patients with COPD without a clear indication, and given their (long-term) side effects, the 2020 European Respiratory Society ICS withdrawal guideline<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> meticulously formulated recommendations in whom to withdraw ICS and in whom not to, based on exacerbation history and blood eosinophil counts. There are no such arguments urging the withdrawal of maintenance LAMA, provided they are tolerated by the patient. Yet, in daily life, failing or varying...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Borst, B., van Geffen, W. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LAMA and ICS discontinuation in COPD: run-in to an exacerbation?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>515</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/516?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Similar movements, different messages: are sit-to-stand tests interchangeable in people with COPD?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/516?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Capturing functional exercise capacity is important in guiding treatment and assessing the efficacy of interventions for individuals with chronic respiratory conditions.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Laboratory-based exercise testing, specifically cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), is considered the gold standard.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> This test provides detailed physiological insights, but is time-consuming and requires specialised equipment, which limits its implementation in routine practice.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Conversely, field tests like the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) or incremental shuttle walk test are simpler, better related to physical activity and have become standard practice for regular assessments.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> These tests provide more limited physiological information. Despite their simplicity, field walking tests still require substantial space and time, which may restrict their use in clinical and real-world settings.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> There has been growing interest in simpler tests suitable for routine screening and treatment follow-up to complement existing measurement tools. Among these, the sit-to-stand (STS) tests have...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mellaerts, P., Troosters, T., Pancera, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224645</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224645</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Similar movements, different messages: are sit-to-stand tests interchangeable in people with COPD?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>516</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>517</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/518?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Customised interfaces for positive airway pressure therapy: precision engineering meets real-world complexity]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/518?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> a highly prevalent condition associated with impaired daytime functioning, cardiometabolic risk and reduced quality of life.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Despite its well-established clinical benefits, sustaining long-term adherence remains a persistent challenge in clinical practice.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> From a patient perspective, the mask interface represents one of the most immediate and tangible influences on adherence. Mask discomfort, unintentional leak, pressure-related skin injury and difficulty maintaining a stable seal are consistently reported barriers to effective treatment and a major focus of clinical troubleshooting.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> However, comparisons of nasal, oronasal and oral PAP interfaces remain limited, although nasal interfaces appear better tolerated.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5 6</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6"></cross-ref></p> <p>Against this background, personalised mask design offers an attractive potential solution. Advances in three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning and additive manufacturing have made it technically feasible to produce patient-specific PAP...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, A. S. L., Lau, E. M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Sleep]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Customised interfaces for positive airway pressure therapy: precision engineering meets real-world complexity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sleep</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>518</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting severe COPD exacerbations: are we ready for risk-based care?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Exacerbations play a central role in the burden, progression, economic impact and prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Prevention and treatment of these events are important parts of the management of this condition. Recent revision of exacerbation group E in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) assessment tool emphasises that every exacerbation is one too many and should be prevented.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Exacerbations are heterogeneous events in many respects. First, the nature of these events varies between different patients<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> and over different points in time.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Also, the frequency of exacerbations differs between patients; 25&ndash;50% of all patients with COPD experience at least one exacerbation per year.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4&ndash;6</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6"></cross-ref> Various risk factors for exacerbations have been identified, including a history of exacerbations, a higher symptom burden and poorer lung function.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R7">7</cross-ref> Nevertheless, predicting exacerbations in...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franssen, F. M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224688</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224688</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting severe COPD exacerbations: are we ready for risk-based care?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[When biomarkers disagree: interpreting FeNO and eosinophils across airway disease]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The search for reliable biomarkers of type 2 (T2) inflammation across asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma&ndash;COPD overlap (ACO) has been a defining theme of respiratory research over the past decade. Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (<I>F</I>eNO) have emerged as clinically accessible markers with clear biological basics and demonstrated prognostic and therapeutic relevance, particularly in asthma and selected COPD populations.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> Yet, as biomarker research expands into large, heterogeneous cohorts, interpretation has become increasingly challenging.</p> <p>In their <I>Thorax</I> paper, Muiser <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> explore the associations of blood eosinophils and <I>F</I>eNO with exacerbation outcomes across asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD in the NOVELTY (NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY on patients with asthma and/or COPD) cohort. While the scale and international scope of NOVELTY are undeniable strengths, several of the reported findings&mdash;most notably the inverse association between <I>F</I>eNO and exacerbation risk in COPD&mdash;raise important...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almansa-Lopez, A., Romero- Palacios, P. J., Alcazar Navarrete, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2026-224810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2026-224810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[When biomarkers disagree: interpreting FeNO and eosinophils across airway disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>523</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/524?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disproportionate impairment in diffusing capacity predicts pulmonary hypertension with an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in COPD]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/524?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Current guidelines for the evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not recommend screening for pulmonary hypertension (PH), despite the high prevalence and impact on outcomes. A simple screening tool to identify patients with an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is urgently needed, as they may benefit from PH-specific therapy and more urgent referral for lung transplantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Research question</st>
<p>We sought to examine whether a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>) to diffusing capacity (DLCO) predicts haemodynamic patterns in COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design and methods</st>
<p>Individuals with COPD who underwent right heart catheterisation from two academic medical centres were included. Adjusted multinomial models tested associations between FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO and haemodynamic patterns. Receiver operating curves were generated to assess the discriminative performance of the FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO ratio in predicting PH with an elevated PVR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Approximately 40% of the 411 individuals included had PH with an elevated PVR. For every 0.1 increase in the FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO ratio, there was a 12&ndash;14% increased rate of PH with an elevated PVR compared with No PH. FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO ratio had moderate discriminative performance (C-statistic 0.68&ndash;0.72), which was strengthened when combined in a model with elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity on echocardiography (C-statistic 0.78&ndash;0.82). Above a threshold of 1.4, FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO demonstrated good specificity (75%) in predicting PH with an elevated PVR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interpretation</st>
<p>These findings suggest that disproportionate reductions in DLCO predict PH with an elevated PVR in a COPD population. The FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/DLCO ratio should be considered in the evaluation of PH in COPD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balasubramanian, A., Hemnes, A. R., Brittain, E. L., Annis, J., Fawzy, A., Putcha, N., Singh, A., Wise, R. A., Hansel, N. N., Simpson, C., Kolb, T. M., Hassoun, P. M., McCormack, M. C., Mathai, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223921</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223921</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disproportionate impairment in diffusing capacity predicts pulmonary hypertension with an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in COPD]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>524</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>532</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/533?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disproportionate increase in COPD exacerbation risk for 3 months after discontinuing LAMA or ICS: insights from the FLAME trial]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/533?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In real-world chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care, poor adherence often leads to treatment discontinuations. Discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can trigger withdrawal effects transiently increasing exacerbation risk; but evidence for long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) withdrawal remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a post hoc analysis of the 52-week, double-blind, Effect of Indacaterol Glycopyrronium versus Fluticasone Salmeterol on COPD Exacerbations trial that compared long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)+LAMA with LABA+ICS in 3362 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and exacerbation history. Potential withdrawal effects after discontinuing LAMA or ICS were suggested by monthly exacerbation incidence plots during the first quarter of follow-up. Participants were stratified by their baseline use of these therapies, and outcomes were compared between the first and subsequent quarters among those who continued versus discontinued each treatment. Multivariable mixed-effects models assessed differences in exacerbation rates, with temporal variation in treatment effects interpreted as indicative of withdrawal effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Discontinuing LAMA was associated with a marked, transient increase in moderate-to-severe exacerbations during the first versus subsequent quarters (p=0.001; rate ratio up to 2.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.1) in the subgroup least influenced by concomitant ICS use). This observation was not confirmed for severe exacerbations, likely due to low event count. In contrast, discontinuing ICS was associated with a significant early rise in severe exacerbations (p=0.023), though the difference for moderate-to-severe events did not reach statistical significance. Importantly, ICS withdrawal effects appeared consistent regardless of baseline blood eosinophil count.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings suggest potent LAMA and ICS treatment withdrawal effects on exacerbations, highlighting the importance of treatment adherence and accounting for withdrawal effects in clinical trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT01782326">NCT01782326</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathioudakis, A. G., Bate, S., Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou, V., Sivapalan, P., Jensen, J.-U. S., Bakerly, N. D., Vestbo, J., Singh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice, Thorax]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disproportionate increase in COPD exacerbation risk for 3 months after discontinuing LAMA or ICS: insights from the FLAME trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>533</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of PRECISE-X model: predicting first severe exacerbation in COPD]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe exacerbations (ECOPDs) impose significant morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines emphasise using ECOPD history to inform preventive treatments but offer limited guidance for risk stratification for the first severe ECOPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We developed and validated PRECISE-X using a cohort of newly diagnosed COPD patients from the UK&rsquo;s Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2004&ndash;2022), to predict first severe ECOPD over 5 years (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome). Predictors were selected via clinical expertise and data-driven methods. Internal-external cross-validation was performed across practice regions to evaluate the model&rsquo;s out-of-sample performance in terms of discrimination (c-statistic), calibration and net benefit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 2 19 015 patients (mean age 66.0; 42.4% female). Observed risk of first severe ECOPD was 29.5% at 5 years (4.2% at 1 year). The final model included four mandatory predictors (sex, age, Medical Research Council dyspnoea score and forced expiratory volume in 1 second) and 28 optional predictors. In internal-external cross-validation, the average out-of-sample c-statistic was 0.836 (95% CI 0.827 to 0.846) for 5-year prediction and 0.756 (95% CI 0.746 to 0.766) for 1-year prediction. Calibration across regions was robust, and the model showed positive NB across a wide range of risk thresholds. In a secondary validation assessment among those with available spirometry data with confirmed airflow obstruction, the model was well calibrated and had only a modest decline in discriminatory performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PRECISE-X accurately predicts the first severe COPD exacerbation using routine clinical data, supporting earlier risk stratification and proactive disease management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadatsafavi, M., Miravitlles, M., Quint, J. K., Perugini, V., Tavakoli, H., Amegadzie, J. E., Alcazar Navarrete, B., on behalf of the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG)-COPD working group, Roche, Soriano, Usmani, Lapperre, Rhee, Harlander, Kaplan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223770</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223770</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Thorax, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of PRECISE-X model: predicting first severe exacerbation in COPD]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/548?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictive capacity of paediatric nasal epithelial cells in sequential CFTR modulator therapy]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/548?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>CFTR modulators have transformed cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment, but individual responses vary even among patients with identical <I>CFTR</I> genotypes. This underscores the need for predictive biomarkers to optimise therapeutic selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated 24 paediatric patients homozygous for F508del-<I>CFTR</I>, assessing lung function (FEV1pp) and sweat chloride (SC) before and after CFTR modulator therapy. Whole-gene sequencing was utilised to identify <I>CFTR</I> and pharmacogene variants. Patient-derived human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) were expanded and differentiated at the air-liquid interface to assess CFTR function via ion transport (Isc).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Clinical responses varied widely. Twelve participants changed modulators during the study. Sequencing identified 231 additional <I>CFTR</I> variants and pharmacogene polymorphisms, but none correlated with response variability. However, a significant linear relationship emerged between Isc and FEV1pp improvement in patients with baseline FEV1pp&lt;90 (R&sup2; = 0.652, p =0.001) and SC reduction (R&sup2; = 0.535, p=0.004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy for SC reduction (area under the curve (AUC)=0.88) and combined FEV1pp/SC response in patients with baseline FEV1pp&lt;90 (AUC=1.00). Exploratory analysis confirmed that Isc predicts FEV1pp changes, modulated by baseline lung function and CFTR modulator type.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient-derived differentiated HNEC cultures serve as a robust predictive tool for CFTR modulator response in paediatric CF patients. Their integration into clinical practice can enhance personalised treatment strategies, minimising ineffective therapy use and improving CF patient outcomes with precision medicine.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fawcett, L. K., Chew, Z. A., Schneider-Futschik, E. K., Allan, K. M., Patel, H. R., Jaffe, A., Waters, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Thorax, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictive capacity of paediatric nasal epithelial cells in sequential CFTR modulator therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cystic fibrosis</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>548</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>559</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heterogeneity of short-term elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor response in cystic fibrosis using 129Xe MRI]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Personalised management of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease in the era of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy will require novel approaches to assess treatment response and monitor longitudinal progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated the heterogeneity of short-term response to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) using <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI, multiple breath washout (MBW) and spirometry. For CFTR modulator-nai&#x0308;ve people &ge;6 years old starting commercial ETI, we measured same-day <sup>129</sup>XeMRI ventilation defect per cent (VDP), lung clearance index (LCI), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>) and CF Questionnaire-Revised respiratory-domain (CFQ-R(R)) at pre-ETI baseline and up to 4 months post-ETI. Baseline versus follow-up measures were compared using Wilcoxon-signed-rank tests with r effect size coefficients. Abnormal follow-up measures determined using z-scores and upper/lower limits of normal; correlations evaluated using Spearman  coefficients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>VDP, FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, LCI and CFQ-R(R) significantly improved in the total group (n=40; all p&lt;0.001, r=0.69, r=0.79, r=0.70, r=0.77) and both &ge;12-year-old subgroups (n=15 FEV<SUB>1</SUB>&lt;80%, p=0.005/r=0.69, p&lt;0.001/r=0.87, p=0.004/r=0.70, p&lt;0.001/r=0.88; n=17 FEV<SUB>1</SUB>&ge;80%, p=0.003/r=0.54, p=0.003/r=0.74, p=0.01/r=0.56, p=0.006/r=0.73). VDP (p=0.008/r=0.89), LCI (p=0.03/r=0.83) and percent-predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB> (p=0.03/r=0.83) significantly improved in the 6&ndash;11-year-old subgroup, with VDP having the greatest effect size in children. VDP remained abnormal at follow-up in 21 participants with normal FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, whereas LCI was abnormal in 12. Baseline VDP (=0.39/p=0.01) and LCI (=0.43/p=0.008) were significantly correlated with the change in CFQ-R(R).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Though all outcome measures showed a positive response, response to ETI was heterogeneous between individuals and between <sup>129</sup>XeMRI, MBW and spirometry. Leveraging the rich information provided by multimodal tools will be critical to understanding the nature of CF lung disease and measuring response to future therapies in the era of CFTR modulators.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy, R. L., Diamond, V. M., Chrenek, J., Bhatnagar, G., Sag, D., Ghadymimahani, R., Aulakh, A., Ha, B. X., Quon, B. S., Rayment, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heterogeneity of short-term elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor response in cystic fibrosis using 129Xe MRI]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cystic fibrosis</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>570</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/571?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tool in lesion verification of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone beam CT in sampling peripheral pulmonary nodules]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/571?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and safety performance of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) with cone beam CT (CBCT) for the biopsy of pulmonary nodules. Additional analysis was performed to assess outcomes for small nodules and those close to the fissure, pleura or mediastinum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This single arm, multicentre prospective study enrolled 200 subjects with suspicious pulmonary nodules. Each subject underwent a ssRAB procedure with CBCT and was subsequently followed up. The primary outcome was tool-in-lesion (TIL) confirmed with CBCT. Further endpoints included diagnostic outcomes and rate of adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 200 subjects recruited, 198 subjects had a successful biopsy (whereby lesion was reached and sample was taken) and 97% completed the required follow-up. The median size of the nodules was 13 mm; 26.8% (60/224) have a positive bronchus sign and 181 (80.8%) were located in the outer two-thirds of the lung. TIL was obtained in 99.0% (198/200). The strict diagnostic yield was 85% (170/200) with diagnostic accuracy of 92.0% (184/200) and sensitivity for malignancy of 95.5% (147/154). Diagnostic accuracy for nodules under 20 mm size, within 5 mm from a critical structure (eg, heart, aorta or main pulmonary artery) or from the pleura was 88.2% (172/195), 100% (11/11) and 93.3% (56/60), respectively. There were four (2%) serious procedure-related adverse events, with one patient (0.5%) suffering a pneumothorax.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>ssRAB with CBCT can effectively reach and biopsy small pulmonary nodules, including perifissural, peripleural and paramediastinal lesions with a strong safety profile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT05867953">NCT05867953</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, L. T., Lau, K. K. W., Orton, C. M., Temov, K., Tana, A., Baboolal, I., Karir, A., Agaoglu, E., Garner, J., Kalyal, A., Lapuente, M., Ttofia, F., Shah, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223631</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223631</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Thorax, Lung cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tool in lesion verification of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone beam CT in sampling peripheral pulmonary nodules]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Lung cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>571</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement properties of the sit-to-stand test in community-dwelling people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a COSMIN systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The sit-to-stand (STS) test can assess physical function in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, there are multiple versions. No study has used current guidelines to assess the measurement properties of the STS tests in people with COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review using current COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Full text peer-reviewed publications were included if they assessed the measurement properties (validity, reliability and/or responsiveness) of at least one STS test among community-dwelling people with COPD. We searched six databases and imported results into Covidence where title/abstract screening and full text selection was completed independently and in duplicate. Extraction was conducted independently and in duplicate using the COSMIN extraction file. We assessed study risk of bias (very good, adequate, doubtful or inadequate), measurement property quality (sufficient, indeterminate or insufficient) and overall certainty of evidence (high, moderate, low or very low) using the COSMIN recommended tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We assessed 2577 titles/abstracts and 102 full texts for inclusion; 30 publications met eligibility. Seven unique STS tests were located with the most common being the 1 min STS test (n=14, 39%), 5-repetition STS test (n=10, 28%) and the 30 s STS test (n=8, 22%). Where assessed, reliability was sufficient for the 1 min, the 5-repetition and the 30 s STS tests. Only the 1 min STS test had high-quality evidence of sufficient construct validity, while the 30 s STS test was the sole test with at least moderate quality evidence of sufficient responsiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The 1 min STS test has the most robust measurement properties for cross-sectional assessments while the 30 s STS test is more robust to assess change.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farley, C., Newman, A. N. L., Phillips, S. M., Smith-Turchyn, J., Brooks, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223967</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223967</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Rehabilitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement properties of the sit-to-stand test in community-dwelling people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a COSMIN systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/591?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic impact and safety of early adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in HIV-negative severe pneumocystis pneumonia: a propensity-matched multicentre study]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/591?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>  <I>Pneumocystis jirovecii</I> pneumonia (PcP) in HIV-negative patients is associated with high mortality rates. While early adjunctive corticosteroid (AC) therapy benefits HIV-positive patients with severe PcP, its efficacy and safety in HIV-negative patients remain poorly investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This multicentre retrospective observational study included consecutive patients diagnosed with proven or probable PcP, from January 2011 to January 2021. This study assessed the prognostic impact and safety of early AC in HIV-negative patients with PcP. To address baseline characteristic imbalances between patients, a non-parsimonious propensity matching analysis was performed with a 1/1 ratio. Survival analysis, day-90 mortality rate and healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) were compared using Cox and logistic regressions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>350 consecutive HIV-negative patients with proven or probable PcP were included. Of these, 116 (33.1%) received early AC within 5 days of anti-PcP therapy initiation. The median arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO<SUB>2</SUB>/FiO<SUB>2</SUB>) ratio was 224 (114&ndash;229). The 90-day mortality rate was 29.4% (103/350). There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality according to AC, both in overall and matched populations (OR 1.27 (0.78&ndash;2.05); p=0.336 and 0.92 (0.52&ndash;1.62); p=0.772, respectively). HCAI incidences appeared similar between groups. In the matched population, a higher proportion of AC patients required high-flow oxygen therapy (OR 2.15 (1.17&ndash;4.05); p=0.015) and mechanical ventilation duration was higher in corticosteroid recipients (OR 1.04 (1.01&ndash;1.09); p=0.048).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Early AC therapy was not associated with reduced 90-day mortality in HIV-negative PcP patients. Although recommended in hypoxemic HIV-positive PcP patients, the benefit of this strategy in HIV-negative patients remains to be proven.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reizine, F., Stiegler, V., Lecuyer, R., Tessoulin, B., Rieul, G., Camou, F., Morio, F., Cady, A., Gabriel, F., Canet, E., Raffi, F., Boutoille, D., Issa, N., Gaborit, B. J., on behalf of the pronocystis study group, Raffi, Boutoille, Biron, Lefebvre, Gaborit, Turnier, Deschanvres, Lecomte, Chauveau, Lecuyer, Asquier-Khati, Pape, Morio, Lavergne, Jeddi, Corvec, Bemer, Caillon, Guillouzouic, Leroy, Lakhal, Cinotti, Roquilly, Reignier, Canet, Blanc, Bretonniere, Morin, Camou, Issa, Guisset, Mourissoux, Accoceberry, Gabriel, Coron, Delhaes, Imbert, Lefranc, Lussac-Sorton, Rougeron, Gousseff, Crabol, Corvaisier, Lautredoux, Lecuyer, Cady, Auger, Pouedras]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223504</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223504</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Respiratory infection]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic impact and safety of early adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in HIV-negative severe pneumocystis pneumonia: a propensity-matched multicentre study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory infection</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>591</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/600?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical impact of customised positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy interfaces (3DPiPPIn): a single site randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/600?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the recognised treatment for sleep disordered breathing (SDB), delivered via a tight-fitting face mask (interface). Conventional interfaces do not consider facial geometries, often resulting in poor fit and ineffective therapy. Three-dimensional (3D) printing of customised interfaces may improve comfort and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the clinical impact of customised versus conventional oronasal interfaces in adults with obstrcutive sleep apnoea (OSA). The primary outcome was residual Apnoea Hypopnea Index (AHI) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included interface leak, therapy concordance and patient reported symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A randomised controlled trial with 160 adults nai&#x0308;ve to PAP therapy and diagnosed with SDB (AHI &ge;15 events/hour). Randomisation was minimised by age and ethnicity. Structured light facial scans (POP2, Revopoint, China) were used to produce 3D printed moulds (Fuse 30+, Formlabs, Massachusetts, USA) for silicone injected oronasal customised interface cushions.</p>
<p>AHI was compared using quantile regression to account for the skewed distribution of the AHI data. Secondary outcomes were compared using logistic, quantile and linear regressions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>160 participants were recruited (intervention: 82, control: 78). Customised interfaces were associated with a 1.5 (events/hour) increase in AHI (p=0.059), higher interface leak (difference in medians 30.0 L/min, 95% CI 7.36 to 40.14, p&lt;0.0001) and lower compliance (difference in compliance 0.78, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.54, p=0.04) at 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This trial did not demonstrate customised oronasal interfaces were superior to conventional interfaces. Future research should focus on addressing design and manufacturing limitations before any potential advantages can be evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="ISRCTN74082423">ISRCTN74082423</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mansell, S. K., Mandal, S., Gowing, F., Ridout, D., Kilbride, C., Olsen, O., Hilton, S., Main, E., Schievano, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-224135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-224135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Sleep]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical impact of customised positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy interfaces (3DPiPPIn): a single site randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sleep</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>606</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/608?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: the missing link?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/608?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A 63-year-old man presented with a fall and head injury. Left arm numbness and jerking progressed to a generalised seizure with loss of consciousness. Following a fourth seizure, left-sided facial droop, left arm weakness and slurred speech only partially resolved. Blood results were unremarkable apart from mildly elevated white cell count of 10.7. CT head demonstrated subtle but progressive abnormality in the right post-central gyrus and a 2 cm cerebral abscess was identified on MRI (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p> <p>Burr hole aspiration grew <I>Aggregatibacter aphrophilus</I> and he was treated with 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. CT performed to exclude malignancy demonstrated a 2.4 cm pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) in the left upper lobe, unusually containing thrombus within the nidus (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2a</cross-ref>). Transthoracic echocardiogram was unremarkable but contrast echocardiogram was positive for extracardiac right to left shunting. The patient successfully underwent PAVM embolisation. An infected wisdom tooth was subsequently found...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanderson, E., McClenaghan, D., Caswell, F., Dubois-Marshall, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2025-223792</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2025-223792</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thorax, Pulmonary vasculature]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: the missing link?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pulmonary vasculature</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>609</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/611?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current strategies and future directions to enhance recovery following critical illness]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/6/611?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Improvements in critical care treatments have led to an increased number of survivors of critical illness and an enhanced recognition of the problems which these patients encounter. Despite this, the ideal strategies to both prevent and manage the problems which people face are yet to be fully elucidated.</p>
<p>This review explores the current methods employed to help mitigate problems encountered by survivors of critical illnesses and current barriers that limit their implementation. We will explore the effect of these issues on under-represented communities and the feasibility of delivering these strategies globally, as well as recent advances in mechanistic research and methodological innovation as promising areas for further work. In doing so, it summarises the potential avenues for future research with a view to advancing clinical care and outcomes in survivors of critical illness.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andonovic, M., Shaw, M., Hartley, P., Jain, S., Boehm, L., Toth, K., Bourne, R., Haines, K. J., Danesh, V., MacTavish, P., Valley, T., Rosa, R. G., Docherty, C., Garrity, K., McCall, P., Tracy, A., Lone, N. I., McPeake, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T01:50:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thorax-2024-221997</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thorax-2024-221997</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Thorax, Rehabilitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current strategies and future directions to enhance recovery following critical illness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>81</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>611</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>620</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>